Aspin v Wilkinson,

JurisdictionBermuda
Date1879
Year1879
CourtSupreme Court (Bermuda)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 cases
  • Waugh v H.B. Clifford & Sons Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 December 1981
    ... ... I do not think we should decide that matter is "collateral" to the action unless it really involves extraneous subject-matter, as in Aspin Wilkinson (1879) 23 Sol.Jo. 388 , and Re a Debtor (1914) 2 K.B. 758 ... So many compromises are made in Court, or in counsel's chambers, without ... ...
  • D'orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 10 March 2005
    ...165 CLR 543 at 560 per Mason CJ. 390 Swinfen v Swinfen (1857) 1 CB (NS) 364 at 403 [ 140 ER 150 at 166]. 391 eg Ibbotson v Shippey (1879) 23 Sol Jo 388. 392 (1916) 21 CLR 393Charlick (1916) 21 CLR 249 at 251. 394Lee v Dixon (1863) 3 F & F 744 [ 176 ER 341]. 395Munster v Lamb (1883) 11 QBD 5......
  • Gaymark Investments Pty Ltd v Nicholas and Sevasti Tsangaris and Emmanuel and Garfalia Gerakios
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • 27 March 1987
    ...action’, and that matter is not ‘collateral’ to the action ‘unless it really involves extraneous subject matter, as in Aspin v Wilkinson (1879) 23 SJ 388, and In Re a Debtor (1914) 2 KB 758’. Applying that test (with which I respectfully agree), his Honour found that the compromise in the ......
  • Nicolaos Tsangaris; Sevasti Tsangaris; Emmanuel Gerakios and Garyfalia Gerakios v Gaymark Investments Pty. Ltd
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • 7 March 1986
    ...we should decide that matter is “collateral” to the action unless it really involves extraneous subject matter, as in Aspin v Wilkinson (1879) 23 SJ 388, and In re A Debtor (1941) 2 KB 758. So many compromises are made in court, or in counsel's chambers, in the presence of the solicitor but......
  • Get Started for Free